Entenser

Global ELO

One strength scale across every league we forecast.

Global ELO is a single number for how strong a club is, on a scale that means the same thing in every competition. Bayern and a Norwegian champion and an MLS side all sit on the same axis, so you can read them against each other instead of guessing how two leagues compare.

Right now Global ELO covers 1,176 clubs across 71 competitions, running from about 688 to 1,737. Higher is stronger. Updated 2026-08-27.

How to read it

The strongest club in each competition, and that competition's midpoint. The gaps between leagues are the point.

CompetitionStrongest clubGlobal ELOLeague midpoint
Premier LeagueLiverpool1,7121,543
Brasileirão Série APalmeiras1,5791,431
EredivisiePSV Eindhoven1,5491,322
EFL ChampionshipBurnley1,5161,372
EliteserienBodo/Glimt1,4961,255
Liga Profesional ArgentinaBoca Juniors1,4291,331
J1 LeagueKashima Antlers1,1991,066
Liga MXToluca1,1111,003
MLSNashville SC1,074947

Read a few rows against each other and the scale starts doing work: the top of a second tier can sit level with the top of a first tier somewhere else, and a dominant club in a smaller league can outrate most of a bigger one.

What Global ELO is not

How it is built

Every club has a domestic rating earned from its own league's results. Global ELO adds one offset per league, placing that whole league on the shared axis. The offset comes from continental matches — clubs from different leagues actually playing each other — and from promotion and relegation links between tiers.

The offset cannot change a forecast. Adding the same number to every club in a league leaves the differences inside that league untouched, and those differences are what the match and season forecasts use. Moving a league up or down the Global ELO scale does not move any of its probabilities.

Where it is weakest

Not every league's placement rests on the same evidence:

Comparisons within a league are the most reliable thing here, because they rest on clubs playing each other every week. Comparisons between confederations are the least reliable: they lean on a much smaller pool of intercontinental matches, and they should move as competitions like the Club World Cup add evidence. Treat a 50-point gap across confederations as noise, not a ranking.

Global ELO changes when the evidence does. A recalibration on 2026-08-01 moved several European clubs by dozens of places once ten top divisions that had been missing a coefficient were given one. We publish those corrections rather than quietly restating them.

Check our work

Every forecast Entenser publishes is graded in public afterwards, hits and misses together. Read the methodology and the scoring record, or browse the competitions.